Showing posts with label driving refresher course. Show all posts
Showing posts with label driving refresher course. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

The cost of Distraction

One parent told me that they talked to their teenage son for months about the dangers of using the cell phone in the car. Nothing seemed to make an impact. Until this video.
Thank G-D is was a video that made the impact instead of a tree or worse

Warning Warning Warning.... This video is NOT for the weak hearted




Another Family Lost in the Car Accident
Simone Cole was taken by a car accident. Sort of speak. Jus prior she sent a text message to her mother. It did not say calling from the next world, It was regarding Thanksgiving but the family would not have. A doctor had just told her that her son, Kyler Allen Eldon Cole, would be induced on Thanksgiving eve if he were not born by then.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

US Government No Texting Law Sample

SAMPLE LAW TO PROHIBIT TEXTING WHILE DRIVING
The purpose of this sample legislation is to provide a framework for state legislatures to use to prohibit texting while driving. While there are many sources of driver distraction, there is heightened concern regarding the risks of texting-while-driving. The act of composing, sending or reading text messages interrupts drivers’ cognitive attention, causes vision to be directed away from the road, and compromises manual control of the vehicle.
While evidence is accumulating on the effects of other sources of driver distraction, a number of states have enacted laws addressing cell phone use and/or texting while driving. Although laws alone will not fully resolve the problem, this sample language is offered as an important step in addressing the growing concern about driver distraction. In 2009, more than 135 billion text messages were sent or received in a one-month period in the U.S., an 80 percent increase over the rate in 2008.
The U.S. Department of Transportation held a Distracted Driving Summit on September 30 - October 1, 2009 in Washington, D.C. to examine the full spectrum of distracted driving across transportation modes: passenger vehicles, large trucks, trains and transit. More than 250 leading traffic safety experts, safety advocates and government officials gathered to define the problem and discuss how best to address it. The summit generated broad agreement among public and private sector organizations and policymakers about the need for texting-while-driving laws. Public surveys also confirm widespread community support for texting bans.
In further recognition of the serious risk posed by texting-while-driving and to demonstrate Federal leadership, President Obama issued an Executive Order on October 1, 2009.1
By the end of 2009, 19 states and the District of Columbia had enacted legislation banning texting-while-driving for all drivers, while a number of other states had laws covering specific types of drivers, such as novice drivers or school bus drivers. However, these laws vary in their design and scope. In 2009 alone, more than 200 driver distraction bills were considered and analysts expect that state legislatures will remain active in coming years as evidence accumulates and the call to take action on this issue becomes yet more urgent. The Order prohibits Federal employees from texting while driving Government owned vehicles or privately owned vehicles while on official Government business or from texting-while-driving using wireless electronic devices supplied by the Government.
Texting laws are relatively new and have not been thoroughly evaluated. However, considering the rapid emergence of the problem and the growing evidence showing the threat to the safety of all road users, safety advocates and state legislatures are compelled to move forward, basing texting legislation on the broad foundation of principles learned from seat belt laws, impaired driving statutes and similar legislative initiatives, while more specific scientific evidence is gathered. This sample law reflects current circumstances and state of knowledge, but may be
1 See www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/2009-obama.html and click on Executive Order 13513 for more information.
revised in the future to incorporate new research findings, address evolving technologies, or to harmonize with other legislation.
In addition to enacting a texting-while-driving law, states may consider other steps to address the issue, including enhanced public awareness and law enforcement programs and improved police crash reports that document specific distractions involved in crashes. Since the prevalence of texting is particularly high among teens, legislatures may also choose to include specific consequences under their graduated drivers licensing law for texting violations by novice drivers, such as delayed full licensure.
The following organizations participated in the development of this sample law: Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AAA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CTIA- The Wireless Association, Governors Highway Safety Association, ITS America, International Association of Chiefs of Police, National Conference of State Legislatures, National Safety Council, The National Traffic Law Center of the National District Attorneys Association, Safe Kids USA, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. The sample law – either in its entirety or in its individual provisions - does not necessarily reflect the positions of any of the individual participating organizations.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Destracted Driver Prevention

[August 20, 2009] http://ip-pbx.tmcnet.com/news/2009/08/20/4333041.htm

ZoomSafer Compiles Research Data to Prevent Distracted Driving

RESTON, Va. --(Business Wire)-- ZoomSafer, the leading provider of safe driving solutions for mobile phones, and experts on distracted driving has compiled a comprehensive list of studies, facts and resources relating to the rapidly growing problem of motorists driving while distracted.


In continuing to lead the charge against distracted driving, this valuable reference resource was assembled by ZoomSafer founders Michael Riemer, Matt Howard, and Mike Costello to educate members of the public and to foster debate about safe driving solutions designed to help people focus on the road and drive less distracted.

Key Distracted Driving Facts (NHTSA) Almost 80% of all crashes and 65% of near crashes in the United States are caused by distracted drivers with cell phone use directly contributing each year to: 6% of crashes 636,000 wrecks 330,000 injuries 12,000 serious injuries 2,600 deaths $43 billion economic impacts Cell Phone Driving Laws by State (US) Cell phone driving laws by state (GHSA) Interactive Maps of Cell Phone Driving Laws (IIHS) Teen / Parent Driving Resources www.noys.org www.underyourinfluence.org www.sadd.org www.keepthedrive.org www.t-driver.com Other Traffic Safety& Distracted Driving Related Organizations www.nsc.org Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS) www.makeroadsafe.org Distracted Driving Studies & Surveys AAA 2009 Traffic Safety Culture Index. July 2009.

87% rated texting or email a very serious threat, ranked almost even with drunk driving 80% rated distracted driving as a very serious threat to their safety 35% of drivers said they feel less safe than 5 years ago and the majority feel no safer at all New Data from VTTI Provides Insight into Cell Phone Use and Driving Distraction. July 2009 Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.

Cell Phone or Other Related Tasks Risk of Crash or Near Crash event Light Vehicle/Cars Dialing Cell Phone 2.8 times as high as non-distracted driving Talking/Listening to Cell Phone 1.3 times as high as non-distracted driving Reaching for object 1.4 times as high as non-distracted driving (i.e. electronic device and other) Heavy Vehicles/Trucks Dialing Cell phone 5.9 times as high as non-distracted driving Talking/Listening to Cell Phone 1.0 times as high as non-distracted driving Use/Reach for electronic device 6.7 times as high as non-distracted driving Text messaging 23.2 times as high as non-distracted driving Texting Worse than Drunk Driving. June 2009. Car and Driver Magazine.

Driving 70 miles per hour on a deserted air strip Car and Driver editor Eddie Alterman was slower and slower reacting and braking when e-mailing and texting. The results: Unimpaired: .54 seconds to brake Legally drunk: add 4 feet Reading e-mail: add 36 feet Sending a text: add 70 feet Mobile Etiquette. June 2009.Intel ( News - Alert)/Harris Interactive Poll.

Nine of 10 adults had a pet peeve with 72 percent of adults reporting that their top annoyance is when others text or type on their mobile devices while driving a car.

Teen Driving Survey. May 2009. Allstate Foundation & NOYS 83 percent of teenagers admit talking on a cell phone while driving.

68 percent of the 16 to 20-year old drivers surveyed said they text while driving, even though they think that talking and texting is as dangerous as driving on icy roads.

New Study Suggests Drivers More Distracted than They Realize. April 2009. NSC Journal of Safety Research.

The results showed that the more difficult activity reduced driving safety more than the easier one. They also showed that drivers did not recognize one activity as more difficult than the other and estimated no difference between the activities' affect on their driving abilities. According to the researchers, these results, combined with previous studies, suggest that drivers are not aware of their own performance loss due to distraction.

KU Researchers Outline America's Top Transportation Threats. January 2009. University of Kansas.

Cell phone users have been found to be 5.36 times more likely to get in an accident than undistracted drivers. The risk is about the same as for drivers with a 0.08 blood-alcohol level.

Talking on a cell phone while driving reduces attention in younger adults so that they have an average increase in accident risk of between 200 percent and 700 percent.

More than a million drivers are using a cell phone during any given daylight moment, yet studies show that motorists who use a cell phone are 5.36 times more likely to get in an accident than undistracted drivers Teens ignore cell phone bans. June 2008. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Insurance Institute for Highway Safety/UNC Highway Safety Research Center 80% of car accidents and 65% of near-crashes involve some form of driver distraction.

Driving While Distracted Research - Nationwide Mutual Insurance Survey. April 2008.

81 percent admit to talking on a cell phone while driving, which translates to estimates of more than 200 million people using cell phones while driving.

A Decrease in Brain Activation Associated With Driving When Listening to Someone Speak. Carnegie Mellon University, Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging. December 2007.

The parietal activation associated with driving decreases significantly (by 37%) with sentence listening Harris Interactive (News - Alert) Poll on Distracted Driving. August 2007 Harris Poll determined that nine out of ten American adults believe that sending text messages while driving is distracting, dangerous and should be outlawed.

According to that same Harris Poll, 57 percent of those surveyed admitted to sending text messages while driving. In the age group of 18 to 34, that number rose to 72 percent.

About ZoomSafer Inc.

ZoomSafer is the safest way to use your mobile phone while driving. We provide innovative mobile software and services to prevent distracted driving for the 20 million smart phone users including prosumers, small business users, families and young drivers, enterprises, and government organizations. For more information, please visit us on the web www.zoomsafer.com.

Driver Safety Device

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Crash Courses in Driving Safety

Sunday, June 21, 2009 Post a Comment
Wisconsin: Crash laboratory teaches more than driving safety
One purpose is to aid the design of better technologies to protect auto occupants.
BY DAVID STEINKRAUS THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.thonline.com/article.cfm?id=247458

MILWAUKEE -- If ever there was a place to convince you of the need for careful driving it is this one, tucked into a pair of nondescript buildings in an obscure corner on the grounds of the Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center.

The crumpled cars are a clue even before you step inside the long, high shed where 471 feet of concrete track ends in a collision chamber lined with concrete blocks to contain the energy of colliding vehicles. With the summer driving season's unofficial kickoff this weekend, with the likelihood of more people driving to nearby vacations in this economically troubled year, it's worth looking for lessons amid the pieces of glass and metal in the automobile crash laboratory run by the Medical College of Wisconsin.

There is a dual purpose for the regular bashing of Audis, Toyotas, Fords, Jaguars and others, said Narayan Yoganandan of the medical college, and both purposes are rooted in trying to understand how injuries occur in a motor vehicle crash. One purpose is to aid the design of better technologies to protect auto occupants. The other is to generate knowledge that will help physicians provide better treatment. Yoganandan, who holds a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering, is chairman of biomedical engineering in the Neurosurgery Department at the medical college.

The crash lab has been running tests in this spot for about 20 years and is one of the contractors used by the federal government to test vehicles for their response in side impacts. (There's another testing contractor in Wisconsin, too: MGA Research Corp. of Burlington.)

Side impact crashes are done at 39 mph as cars are hit by a wheeled sled weighing 3,000 pounds with a front that replicates a car bumper. Front-impact tests are done at 35 mph.

The result is the government's crash ratings in which the occupants of a 5-star vehicle would suffer serious injuries in 10 or fewer of every 100 crashes. In cars rating 1 star, occupants would have serious injuries in 46 or more of every 100 crashes. (You can look results up by model year and make at http://www.safercar.gov)

The newest part of the lab is next door in the neurosurgery research facility.

Here a metal platform is shoved down a track by an air-powered ram, and on the platform is a test dummy.

The platform can carry more sensors, and cameras can be mounted all around the room to photograph what happens to the dummy from various angles, and it's easier to measure all the forces by taking dummies out of cars.

More importantly, from the standpoint of science, is the ability to repeat an event. Unlike a car crash, a computer controls the platform, and can change the forces applied in minute ways, and can do that again and again.

Michael Schlick, a research engineer and the lab manager, flipped open a notebook and showed a graph plotting the forces recorded in a crash. Instead of being a smooth line covering a few tenths of a second, the plot had little steps in it. Those minute changes in force may come from a bumper crumpling or an engine mount absorbing energy and then failing, he said.

"There's two cars, identical cars, you'll never get the same result," Yoganandan said. "Whereas here, if you set up everything perfect, you can get absolute repeatability."

At the moment the lab is studying crash dummies as part of a national project to design a better one. Schlick illustrated the need by bending the neck of a standard crash dummy. It's stiff, which means that in a frontal impact, the dummy's head snaps down and the forehead hits the steering wheel. In reality, he said, the human head moves forward slightly first in a crash, as if you were pushing your face forward. In reality that means that people's chins, teeth and noses hit the steering wheel.

Yoganandan said we have made great progress in auto safety. When the government began issuing crash worthiness ratings, most cars earned only 1 or 2 stars. "And now what has happened is there are very few cars at 1."

But we're also learning that modern technologies, the ages of occupants, how their weight is distributed, and other factors affect injuries, he said.

Last month, a group of medical college researchers published a study saying that newer vehicles, because of their better protection, have decreased the likelihood of facial fractures, the most common injury in motor vehicle collisions. But at the same time, the study said, the frequency of injuries hasn't dropped in side-impact collisions, suggesting that there is work to be done.

We may have reached a plateau in crash safety. Nationally crashes have killed about 43,000 people annually for several years, said Jacob Nelson, national director of traffic safety policy for AAA.

Information from the state Transportation Department shows the number of crashes and fatal crashes in Wisconsin was relatively steady from 2002 to 2007, and the number of crashes per 100 people varies little from year to year and county to county. For Racine County, that has meant about two crashes per 100 people.

"There's no way to know exactly why that is, but there definitely is a culture of complacency about the toll that you pay for travel on America's roadways," Nelson said.

"A lot of what causes crashes is basically preventable. They're decisions people make. People make a decision to speed." Or they decide not to wear seat belts, or to drive drunk. Those are the three largest factors in traffic crashes.

"So I think we really need to start looking at driver behavior and how we can change driver behavior in a positive way." AAA is starting on just such a project, he said.

In other words, the road to safer highways is still long, and we still have far to go.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

UK Driving Simulator

Learner drivers are being invited to test how good -- or bad -- they are at spotting potential hazards on the road, with the help of University of Nottingham researchers.

Learners are being offered the chance to use the very latest driving simulator at the University to help them sharpen their driving skills -- while getting paid in the process.

Psychologists are looking for 200 learner drivers to take part in a study looking at the way that novice drivers can become distracted, and how they react to common potential hazards that are faced by drivers on the road every day.

And as well as helping them to prepare for their own driving tests with the latest high-tech equipment, volunteers will be aiding research aimed at increasing safety on UK roads in the future.

The researchers are keen to hear from learners aged between 17 and 25, who have had six or more on-road lessons and who are learning to drive in the UK.

They will be put through their paces in a driving simulator recently installed in a laboratory at the School of Psychology. While 'driving', participants wear a special helmet with a sensitive device installed for tracking eye movement. They then follow a route which involves various hazards, and the simulator not only detects how they respond to the hazards, but exactly where they look at each stage of the journey.

Learner drivers will be able to use Risk Awareness package currently offered in driving centres run by BSM, the UK's largest driving school. This involves driving in the simulator, watching a training video detailing certain aspects of hazard perception and then completing a further drive in the simulator. This should take less than one hour and each volunteer will be paid £7 for taking part.

Dr Lyn Jackson, one of the organisers of the study, said: "This package was designed my BSM to improve hazard awareness and we are inviting 200 learners to have it for free.

"The simulator is a real boon to learner drivers because they can encounter hazardous situations, and learn from them, without any actual physical risk.

"Given that hazard perception is a skill that learner drivers need to develop to pass their driving test any extra practice they can get will be beneficial."

New drivers are involved in a disproportionately high number of accidents in the UK, and research suggests one factor might be the way they react when potential hazards appear on the road. One of the main differences between novice and experienced drivers is that novices tend to want to look either straight ahead, or down at the dashboard, while experienced drivers pay much more attention to their surroundings rather than their own car.

The University of Nottingham researchers hope that their findings will be used to help train new drivers to be more aware of hazards and better able to deal with them.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Youngster Taught to Drive Safe

http://www.uknetguide.co.uk/Motoring/Article/Youngsters_to_be_taught_safe_driving_from_11-104254.html

Given that young drivers account for a disproportionally high level of accidents on Britain's roads, a majority of motorists would likely give their support to push the age at which people can legally get behind the wheel up to 18, or even 21.

However, according to a new initiative, rather than waiting for youngsters to mature before they are allowed to get their licences, the trick to making the roads safer is to teach them good habits at an early age.

Opened this week, the Mercedes-Benz Driving Academy will offer kids as young as 11 the chance to take a spin around an old race track in Surrey, with the organisers stressing that the emphasis will be placed firmly on safety rather than just fun.

In addition to learning how to perform all the basic manoeuvres, the next generation of drivers - who must be at least 1.5 metres tall to be allowed a place on one of the courses - will even be taught things that are beyond many adult motorists, such as coping with icy conditions, developing good on-the-road etiquette and driving with music on.

Furthermore, top-up-lessons will also be on offer to those youngster who have just passed their test but who are keen to get more real-life driving experience before hitting the open road on their own.

Nev Pooley, a senior instructor at the school, explained: "Here we can teach aspects of driving you can't do on the roads.

"An emergency stop at 70mph, like we do here, would obviously be dangerous on a public road."

While it is likely that a majority of the school's pupils will see the lessons around the track as fun rather than educational, the aim is to address the fact that around one in three drivers killed or seriously injured on the UK roads are under the age of 25.

Launching the driving school, reigning F1 world champion Lewis Hamilton explained to the Times that "the speed limit is there for a reason and I think everyone should stick to it".

"When you are on a race circuit the target is to be as fast as you can, but away from the circuit you slip into your everyday life and on the roads it’s all about safety," he said.

Meanwhile, the dangers posed by loud in-car radios could soon be a thing of the past as the new recommendations laid out by Lord Carter's 'Digital Britain' report suggest that national and local radio stations will switch to broadcasting solely on digital channels within the next few years.

Though this is unlikely to affect those young drivers tech-savvy enough to hook their own systems up to car speakers, it has already been predicted that many older motorists, and particularly those with older cars, will be left behind and as such will have to get used to driving around without football commentary or music on in the background.

Unity on Driver Safety

ESB and RSA to promote road safety in workplace

TThe ESB and the Road Safety Authority (RSA) have agreed a landmark strategic alliance to advance their goals for safer driving over the next three years.

The new partnership will see the development of a three-year plan 'Achieving Safe Driving Excellence', to provide a best practice model for developing procedures governing road safety in the workplace.

ESB Deputy Chief Executive Johnny Shine said that ESB is committed to the highest level of safety performance in all its activities including its fleet and private vehicle driving. Implementing safe driving policies within the ESB has resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in serious collisions and a 20 per cent drop in material damage collisions between 2003 and 2008."

"This reduction in fatal collisions and in serious injuries has saved untold human misery and saved the exchequer approximately €28 million. In addition our motor insurance premia fell to 15 per cent of 2003 levels," he commented.

"Going forwardthe ESB is implementing a safe driving programme targeted at improving every facet of driving across its businesses and working towards the elimination of incidents and injuries associated with driving and transport activities. The creation of this strategic alliance with the RSA will allow us to tap into their expertise and will certainly strengthen our safe driving programme", he added.

Commenting on the Strategic Alliance, the Chief Executive of the RSA, Noel Brett said that driving for work involves risk not only for the driver, but also for their fellow workers and members of the public
.

"As an employer or self-employed person you must, by law, manage the risks that may arise when employees drive for their work. The ESB has pioneered the way in this country when it comes to road safety in the work place. We are delighted with this partnership with ESB. It will ultimately lead to the development of a best practice model for employers to successfully enable them to manage the risks associated with driving for work", he added.

On a practical level the strategic alliance will involve implementing such measures as:

" ESB promoting its safe driving programme to other employers to demonstrate the benefits to employees and the business.

" Collaborating on new vehicle safety requirements associated with the introduction of new legislation and technologies such as electric vehicles.

" Sharing emerging technology advancements and identifying practical issues within Fleet Management and ways of incorporating them into the ESB vehicle fleet.

" RSA providing assistance to ESB in developing Safe Road Use training programmes

The ESB has a 'liveried fleet' of almost 3,000 utility vehicles but, in addition, 4,000 ESB staff use their own private cars on ESB business. These fleets cover almost 80 million kilometres annually. ESB is also an international company and many staff drive abroad, which introduces further hazards.

http://hgvireland.com/news09a/09hgv285.html

Driving Refresher Course

ENTERPRISE STAFF WRITER
Posted Jun 20, 2009 @ 11:42 PM

BROCKTON —

Roughly 20 percent of licensed Americans — or about 41 million drivers on the road — would not pass a written driver’s exam if taken today, according to results from the 2009 GMAC Insurance National Drivers Test.

The online test, in its fifth year, is comprised of 20 questions taken from actual exams given by state motor-vehicle departments.

Overall, findings from the 2009 survey indicate the number of American drivers with knowledge of basic road rules is decreasing, with this year’s average test score, 76.6 percent, lower than last year’s, 78.1 percent.

Respondents continued to have difficulty on questions about yellow lights and safe following distances, while almost all drivers answered correctly what a solid line meant.

The test “is a just a good reminder to refresh your knowledge of the rules of the road,” said Mike Dunklee, spokesman for the Detroit-based GMAC Insurance.

The 2009 survey polled more than 5,000 licensed Americans from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Massachusetts drivers, with an average score of 73.8 percent, ranked 45th on the list.

Idaho and Wisconsin drivers tied for first in the nation, with an average test score of 80.6 percent; New York drivers ranked last, with an average score of 70.5 percent.

To check your knowledge, take the test at www.gmacinsurance.com/SafeDriving.

Maria Papadopoulos can be reached at mpapadopoulos@enterprisenews.com.